Update on Voeltz v Obama- Latest Motion Demanding Written Opinion
This case is still grinding along, now with two illegal, unconstitutional rulings. Do Voeltz and Klayman quit? Hell, no. How about you?
from Plaintiff Mike Voeltz
Filed 2/28/2012. The criminals are trying to shut me down at the Fla. Appeals level by issuing a “per curium affirmance” of the lower court, which basically allows the Fla. judiciary to shut down dissent by issuing no written opinion– thus there is no basis for appeal. Florida rule of Appellate procedure 9.330(a) allows for a motion for a written opinion under strict guidlines (which I have followed to a T). This motion will solidify my cause of action all the way to the Supreme Court. If they do not issue a written opinion I will appeal directly there. If they do issue a written opinion, then I can use that opinion to appeal to the Fla. Supreme Court. They are in a quandry, as I caught Judge Terry Lewis in a very big lie, and their written opinion will have to approve of that lie— that Florida election statutes do not apply to presidential elections—The Florida Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that they SPECIFICALLY AND EXPLICITLY do apply (Palm Beach Co. Canvassing v. Harris (2000)). As such I have a constitutional complaint that the Florida judiciary has violated my due process and equal protection rights, as well as violating their own laws and the Federal law of US Code 3 section 5, by not adjudicating my case with finality (which in Florida is viewed as a judgment by the district appeals court) by 6 days prior to the meeting of electors. The appeals court had my appeal in July, yet they waited till 2 months after the meeting of electors to dispense of my case.
No comments:
Post a Comment